<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIDS vaccines in Paris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rybicki.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/aids-vaccines-in-paris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rybicki.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/aids-vaccines-in-paris/</link>
	<description>Up-to-date Virology-related posts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian McILROY</title>
		<link>http://rybicki.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/aids-vaccines-in-paris/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorian McILROY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rybicki.wordpress.com/?p=348#comment-416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, definitely &quot;unreservedly&quot;. As far as I can see, the study was really well carried out and analyzed. But I do find it inexplicable that such a huge effort was made to test such unpromising vaccine candidates. I still think that the partial protection observed in the trial was probably due to innate responses to the vector, and that the vaccine failed to induce a durable, protective HIV-specific immune response.

DMc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, definitely &#8220;unreservedly&#8221;. As far as I can see, the study was really well carried out and analyzed. But I do find it inexplicable that such a huge effort was made to test such unpromising vaccine candidates. I still think that the partial protection observed in the trial was probably due to innate responses to the vector, and that the vaccine failed to induce a durable, protective HIV-specific immune response.</p>
<p>DMc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gib</title>
		<link>http://rybicki.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/aids-vaccines-in-paris/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rybicki.wordpress.com/?p=348#comment-411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So I think one should unreservedly treat the results as high-quality.&quot;

Do you mean reservedly ?
I have reservations about everything (except when I forget to book for dinner...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So I think one should unreservedly treat the results as high-quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you mean reservedly ?<br />
I have reservations about everything (except when I forget to book for dinner&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
